Christian Nihilism

If I were not a Christian I would be a nihilist, and I regularly have to keep my natural tendency toward existential nihilism in check. There is a reason Ecclesiastes is my favorite book. It is the most hopeless and nihilistic book in all of scripture. Despite my optimistic, idealistic, and altruistic nature, I thrive on hopelessness and despair.

If you do a quick inventory of my favorite movies (Dogville, Match Point, City of God, 28 Days Later, the Last Kiss, etc), you will see that they are ones in which there is no redemption and where people treat each other callously and without any remorse for the harm they inflict. They often get away completely guilt-free with murder. I would also personally act this way toward others if I truly embraced nihilism, as I am inclined to do – and I know there is real malevolent evil in my heart. That is why those films resonate so personally with me.

In a world completely devoid of any true or ultimate justice, this is truly the way things are. There is no reason at all for a rational person to not act consistently in a manner of complete and total selfishness, even to the point of murder and mean-spirited deception even for entertainment’s sake, so long as it maximizes one’s own rational self-interest. If a person can kill their mistress without getting caught and live with the guilt for the rest of their life because her death will ultimately bring them a far more pleasurable life in the long run (as happens in the plot of one of the films I mentioned above), this is completely morally acceptable. There is NO reason at ALL to condemn this action in the absence of moral values and ultimate justice.

Likewise, in the absence of any moral values or ultimate justice, there is no grounding upon which to condemn infant rape, instrumental rape during war with machetes, brutal female circumcision, animal mutilation and abuse, the torturing and murder of homosexuals going on right now in the middle east and still in our country, generations of racism and violence, or any other heinous and violent act that we consider to be a violation of justice. There is no grounding at all upon which to cry “FOUL!” The best we can do is to say that we just don’t like these acts, but we can never condemn them as truly wrong, because the very concept of ultimate, objective wrong does not even exist.

No humans will ever agree on exactly what actions should be defined as “right” and “wrong” in a moral sense – that has been culturally, religiously, and sociologically dependent even person by person for as long as humans have lived in society together. Even in a marriage no two people are ever going to completely agree on every moral and ethical issue. But if we can’t even agree that the concept of objective, transcendent moral values actually exist (meaning outside of our own collective human consciousness – in other words, outside of our own heads), then we’re really screwed.

I’m not arguing that we should go put up the 10 Commandments at any Capitol buildings. That’s just stupid. My point is much more philosophical and is far broader than any issue that encompasses any religion.

I would be a nihilist if were not a Christian and if I did not believe that objective moral values exist external to the human mind. I do not pass judgment at all on anyone else who believes otherwise, but if I did not believe what I do, I would personally lie, cheat, steal, manipulate, and live my life to fully maximize my own rational self-interest (in other words, completely selfishly). Yes, I might even murder if I thought it would benefit me in some way – and I highly doubt that I would feel a shred of guilt about it. The “guilt gene” seems to have skipped a generation with me. That is why I absolutely love this Aldous Huxley quote (and I also adore Brave New World, incidentally):

I had motives for not wanting the world to have a meaning; and consequently assumed that it had none, and was able without any difficulty to find satisfying reasons for this assumption. The philosopher who finds no meaning in the world is not concerned exclusively with a problem in pure metaphysics. He is also concerned to prove that there is no valid reason why he personally should not do as he wants to do. For myself, as no doubt for most of my friends, the philosophy of meaninglessness was essentially an instrument of liberation from a certain system of morality. We objected to the morality because it interfered with our sexual freedom. The supporters of this system claimed that it embodied the meaning–the Christian meaning, they insisted–of the world. There was one admirably simple method of confuting these people and justifying ourselves in our erotic revolt: we would deny that the world had any meaning whatever.”
[Aldous Huxley, Ends and Means, 1937]

Huxley admits that he had reasons (namely his unrestrained sexual freedom) for believing that the world has no meaning. It seems that the Christians are not the only ones who start from a conclusion and then work backward to their premises. They just happen to get accused of it far more often. Hmmm…

The reason I am a Christian is not merely because I am convinced that objective moral values do exist, but also because of what I find to be an encyclopedic body of evidence in support of the basic claims of the faith‡, and because of the absolute lack of coherence and rationality I find in all alternate worldviews that I have explored. I was a sincere agnostic/atheist from about the time I was around 10 yrs old, through my entire teenage years, and into the beginning of my adult life. Not to mention that the horrors of the flipside of the ‘problem of evil’ are almost too much for me to handle. All of this hit me as a 14 year old atheist when I was writing death poetry in my own blood about how we will all ultimately be turned to dust, with no hope and no redemption.

The ‘problem of evil’ in this world is simply not a problem for me and it never was. However, the problem of no ultimate justice for the Holocaust is a HUGE problem for me, and it’s a huge problem for atheists as well. I guess their only answer is, “it sucks to be Jews.” At least believers in some semblance of a justice-fulfilled afterlife have a kind of response.

Additionally, personal experience is not at all why I believe (especially since it all happened after my conversion), but there have been some very odd coincidences in my life since summer 2001 when I officially “converted” or whatever you want to call it. Yes, granted, it is entirely possible that they are all just coincidences, but the statistical improbability of some of the things that have happened (on specific dates, etc) has been very strange.

Anyway, to sum it all up, I’m a Christian who struggles with nihilism. I still struggle with the evil in my own heart and mind and with the idea that I should care about anything in the world at all. Also I know that I am personally capable of truly heinous acts. People are NOT basically good. That statement is complete and total bullshit. I love the MGMT song Time To Pretend because it is sublimely true. The band has managed to write the ultimate anthem to nihilism. Here are the lyrics. Enjoy.

I’m feeling rough, I’m feeling raw, I’m in the prime of my life.
Let’s make some music, make some money, find some models for wives.
I’ll move to Paris, shoot some heroin, and fuck with the stars.
You man the island and the cocaine and the elegant cars.

This is our decision, to live fast and die young.
We’ve got the vision, now let’s have some fun.
Yeah, it’s overwhelming, but what else can we do.
Get jobs in offices, and wake up for the morning commute.

Forget about our mothers and our friends
We’re fated to pretend
To pretend
We’re fated to pretend
To pretend

I’ll miss the playgrounds and the animals and digging up worms.
I’ll miss the comfort of my mother and the weight of the world.
I’ll miss my sister, miss my father, miss my dog and my home.
Yeah, I’ll miss the boredom and the freedom and the time spent alone.

But there’s really nothing, nothing we can do.
Love must be forgotten, life can always start up anew.
The models will have children, we’ll get a divorce.
We’ll find some more models, everything must run its course.

We’ll choke on our vomit and that will be the end.
We were fated to pretend
To pretend
We’re fated to pretend
To pretend

Yeah, yeah, yeah

_____________________________________

‡ Note that I said BASIC claims of the faith – if you get to know me you will find that I will only try to defend solidly 2 or 3 main issues. The rest of the doctrinal concerns are entirely debatable as far as I’m concerned. I’ll just be over here trying to feed the poor, care for the sick, and fight for those who don’t have a voice. Even if I’m doing a bad job at it, which I admit that I am most of the time.

It’s called empathy and basic human comapssion

Widely published status update on facebook and twitter yesterday:

No one should die because they cannot afford health care, and no one should go broke because they get sick. If you agree, please post this as your status for the next 24 hours.

Now, the question of whether we should change the current health care system in the U.S. or or how to do so is a completely separate issue from the statement made in the first sentence of the quotation above. Therefore, in my humble opinion, anyone who would disagree with the basic premise of the statement above is pretty much a worthless person completely devoid of all human compassion.

The United Nations has declared health care to be a basic human right (Article 25), as has the United Methodist Church in their Social Principles (¶162.V). We can disagree civilly on how to achieve the ends to the goal of minimal standards of health care for all citizens… but who in good faith can still call themselves a decent human being and yet have the audacity to disagree with the statement that no one should die because they can’t afford health care? I mean really. REALLY? It is well documented that people (yes, even young people) do in fact still die the United States all the time because they cannot afford costly health care procedures. Paying for health care is still the #1 reason for bankruptcies in this country. I have personally been nickel and dimed by insurance companies and I personally know several individuals with their own insurance horror stories. Something’s gotta give.

So back to my original point on basic human compassion… here are a few alternative status updates I also had the misfortune of seeing on facebook and twitter yesterday:

This person thinks no one should [...] post this as your status for the rest of the day

Some people don’t deserve health care, and some people deserve to be broke.

President Obama is using the same tactics as Adolf Hitler. He is trying to pervert the youth of America with his socialistic ideals. Health care is NOT a right. Even our founding fathers knew better than to ty [sic] this. What is wrong with people in this country?

What was even worse than these updates were the comments that followed underneath them. Many of the comments were along he lines of “I hate poor people” and “LOL OMG I SO agree.”

Many of these people dare to call themselves Christians. What happened to feeding the poor and caring for the sick? If anyone in the world is going to know that I’m a Christian, I would rather they know me as someone who takes the gospel message to mean caring for the least of these – working toward social justice and meeting people’s physical needs in this world. Following Christ is not just about praying a prayer and then merely going off to judge others’ immoral lifestyles and condemn things that shouldn’t be done. What about working to change the world for the better? Feeding the poor? Caring for the sick?

Personally, I know that I haven’t spoken up enough to correct the wrongs when I see them being perpetuated. And that’s because I know that when I do speak up I can tend to be a bit of a jackass (ok, so I have been a complete and total sarcastic and condescending jackass. I shoot my mouth off with snarky comments and I have not yet mastered the delicate art of tact.) I know this is a huge personal weakness and I am working on it slowly day by day. It is wrong and I need to change.

Fortunately, my husband has been my biggest inspiration and mentor. He is able to confront people firmly but with tact, logic, and reason, and without resorting to sarcasm and intentional condescension. He would make a fantastic college professor and/or attorney (which are coincidentally the two fields he is pursuing graduate degrees in currently!) Right now I just get angry and I want to be mean for meanness’ sake. Yes, I have pure motives and the good of the world and individuals at heart, but in the heat of the moment I often just shoot off my mouth. And for that I am truly sorry.

What is boils down to is this: We can disagree intensely on how to reach certain political goals. That is to be expected. However, I would like to think that people will hold empathy and compassion first and foremost  in all political conversations from here on out. The recent discourse of the past few months, as evidenced in comments like the ones above, has certainly not been shaping up that way.

15 Books

(From an internet meme…)

Fifteen books you’ve read that will always stick with you. They don’t have to be the greatest books you’ve ever read, just the ones that stick with you. First fifteen you can recall in no more than 15 minutes. Here are mine, in no particular order, except the first two:

1. Ecclesiastes – Qohelet (could be King Solomon)
2. A Prayer for Owen Meaney – John Irving ***
3. Good News for Women: A Biblical Picture of Gender Equality – Rebecca Merrill Groothuis
4. Pride and Prejudice – Jane Austen
5. The Watchmen – Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons
6. Mere Christianity (or, The Case for Christianity) – CS Lewis
7. Reasonable Faith – William Lane Craig
8. Finally Feminist – John G. Stackhouse Jr.
9. Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave – Frederick Douglass
10. Thoughts Upon Slavery – John Wesley
11. Nine Stories – JD Salinger
12. I Know This Much Is True – Wally Lamb
13. Never Let Me Go – Kazuo Ishiguro
14. Lord of the Flies – William Golding
15. The Metamorphosis – Franz Kafka

*** Owen Meany was my favorite book of all time for many years (way before I was a Christian, I may add… also, for the record, John Irving is not a Christian and never was) until Ecclesiastes bumped it down a notch.

I feel bad that only two of my fifteen were written by women… but such was the great literature and non-fiction of the last few hundred years. I didn’t have much of a sample to choose from. Again, this is just a list of books that have stuck with me. I am not going to use this post to explain precisely why.

Are you a Christian hipster?

http://www.conversantlife.com/god-and-culture/are-you-a-christian-hipster

I find this article to be hilarious… it’s not trying to be satirical or funny, it’s just accurately reporting a list of things Christian hipsters are into. A few of my favorite quotes:

“…we all know that hipsters hate labels.”

“Christian hipsters love thinking and acting Catholic, even if they are thoroughly Protestant/evangelical.”

“They love poetry readings, worshipping with candles, and smoking pipes while talking about God. Some of them like smoking a lot of different things.”

“Christian hipsters love breaking the taboos that used to be taboo for Christians.”

Authors they like: Flannery O’Connor, Walker Percy, Wendell Berry, Thomas Merton, John Howard Yoder, Walter Brueggemann, N.T. Wright, Brennan Manning, Eugene Peterson, Anne Lamott, C.S. Lewis, G.K. Chesterton, Henri Nouwen, Soren Kierkegaard, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Annie Dillard, Marilynne Robison, Chuck Klosterman, David Sedaris, or anything ancient and/or philosophically important.

It’s funny cause it’s true…

Thoughts Upon Slavery – John Wesley 1774

It’s absolutely amazing to me that John Wesley (and William Wilberforce) was so far ahead of his time compared to what people in the U.S. were doing about the slave trade at that time (which is, to encourage and defend it based on supposed biblical principles!). Reading Thoughts Upon Slavery on a public train in the UK actually made me weep. The full text is available online here: http://gbgm-umc.org/umw/wesley/thoughtsuponslavery.stm

However, here are a few wonderful excerpts that make me proud to call myself a (pseudo) Methodist:

This is the plain, unaggravated matter of fact. [speaking of brutality and violent kidnappings/people being stolen under the guise of 'prisoners of war'] Such is the manner wherein our African slaves are procured; such the manner wherein they are removed from their native land, and wherein they are treated in our plantations. I would now inquire, whether these things can be defended, on the principles of even heathen honesty; whether they can be reconciled (setting the Bible out of the question) with any degree of either justice or mercy.

The grand plea is, “They are authorized by law.” But can law, human law, change the nature of things? Can it turn darkness into light, or evil into good? By no means. Notwithstanding ten thousand laws, right is right, and wrong is wrong still. There must still remain an essential difference between justice and injustice, cruelty and mercy. So that I still ask, Who can reconcile this treatment of the Negroes, first and last, with either mercy or justice?

Where is the justice of inflicting the severest evils on those that have done us no wrong? of depriving those that never injured us in word or deed, of every comfort of life? of tearing them from their native country, and depriving them of liberty itself, to which an Angolan has the same natural right as an Englishman, and on which he sets as high a value? Yea, where is the justice of taking away the lives of innocent, inoffensive men; murdering thousands of them in their own land, by the hands of their own countrymen; many thousands, year after year, on shipboard, and then casting them like dung into the sea; and tens of thousands in that cruel slavery to which they are so unjustly reduced?

That slave-holding is utterly inconsistent with mercy, is almost too plain to need a proof.

What wonder, if they should cut your throat? And if they did, whom could you thank for it but yourself? You first acted the villain in making them slaves, whether you stole them or bought them. You kept them stupid and wicked, by cutting them off from all opportunities of improving either in knowledge or virtue: And now you assign their want of wisdom and goodness as the reason for using them worse than brute beasts!

May I speak plainly to you? I must. Love constrains me; love to you, as well as to those you are concerned with. Is there a God? You know there is. Is he a just God? Then there must be a state of retribution; a state wherein the just God will reward every man according to his works. Then what reward will he render to you? O think betimes! before you drop into eternity! Think now, “He shall have judgment without mercy that showed no mercy.”  Are you a man? Then you should have an human heart. But have you indeed? What is your heart made of? Is there no such principle as compassion there? Do you never feel another’s pain? Have you no sympathy, no sense of human woe, no pity for the miserable?

Wow. I truly, truly, truly loves me some John Wesley. The full text is extremely moving.

Buy the pamphlet here: http://www.wesleyschapel.org.uk/shop.htm#books

Also, give these people money… http://www.wesleyschapel.org.uk/index.htm

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.